There’s nothing rather as pleasing as seeing someone closed down one of the obnoxious hosts of “The View” using sound facts and logic, two things these individuals just do not appear to have.
This is specifically exactly what occurred when previous Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld made a look on the show and managed to shoot down Delight Behar’s rambling about Donald Trump’s victory in the 2016 election.
And it just took two words.
Inning accordance with The Daily Caller, Donald Rumsfeld closed down Joy Behar on “The View” Thursday when she argued with him that Hillary Clinton in fact won the election due to the fact that she got more votes.
“Well he [Donald Trump] lost by more than three million votes in the popular vote. He won the electoral vote,” Behar explained to the previous Secretary of Defense.
“What counts?” Rumsfeld reacted.
“Well the electoral vote counts,” Behar answered.
“I thought so,” Rumsfeld said.Then Behar
and co-host Sunny Hostin began comparing the examination into supposed ties between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia with Watergate and aiming to get Rumsfeld to address concerns about it. He didn’t hold back.Rumsfeld replied by saying,”I believe suggesting that we are at a point that approximates Watergate I think is a stretch. Why do you wish to engage in hypotheticals? This man was elected president of the United States.”He finished up by stating that there’s currently an
examination being performed, which is the ideal course of action, however since absolutely nothing has actually been formally concluded, folks assuming Trump’s guilt are jumping to conclusions. This is a classic example of somebody allowing their ideology to
form and shape their conclusions about an individual and occasion without having the appropriate facts and proof to assist their thinking. Liberals get upset when conservatives do this, yet they appear to desire a free pass when they do it themselves. Life doesn’t work that method, sadly. As far as the election, it’s truly time to get over it. It’s been six months.
No quantity of bellyaching over the electoral process will alter what’s currently taken place, so why continue to harp on it? [Note: This short article was composed by Michael Cantrell]