WASHINGTON (CNN)– Melania Trump’s communications director on Friday let loose– for the 2nd time– an intense missive dismissing the juicy tell-all that paints a chaotic image of White House happenings.
“The book is a work of fiction. It is a long-form tabloid that markets incorrect declarations and overall fabrications about Mrs. Trump,” said Stephanie Grisham in a declaration to CNN pressing back versus Michael Wolff’s explosive book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House.”
“Simply put, it’s reckless but another ‘reporter’ looking to profit off the Trump household and this administration,” stated Grisham.Grisham’s comments echoed her initial action to the controversial book released Wednesday, when excerpts were initially made public. Those parts consisted of a snippet that stated the very first lady was so upset that her spouse won the presidency she shed tears of unhappiness on election night. The book also revealed that the first couple, according to Wolff, is the first since the Kennedys to have separate bed rooms in the White Home Executive House. While Grisham did not directly attend to particular passages, she did reject the very first girl was dissatisfied about her partner’s triumph.”This book is clearly going to be offered in the deal fiction area.
Mrs. Trump supported her other half’s decision to run for president and in reality, motivated him to do so. She was positive he would win and was very happy when he did, “Grisham said.CNN has not separately confirmed all the information in Wolff’s book.This is not the very first time, nor even the 2nd, the very first lady has had a heated action to claims she considers false.
Melania Trump, who as soon as warned that when her other half gets assaulted, he punches back 10 times harder, seems to use a similar credo when it comes to her own reputation. In October, after Ivana Trump said on a talk program that she didn’t telephone her ex-husband at the White Home because she didn’t
wish to make Melania Trump “jealous, “the existing Mrs. Trump made it clear to the former Mrs. Trump that she was barely concerned– nor did she think Ivana’s claim that she remained “first woman. “Instead of preventing the salaciousness of the commentary, Trump pitched in with a declaration from Grisham:”Mrs. Trump has actually made the White House a house
for Barron and the President. She likes residing in Washington, DC, and is honored by her role as first girl of the United States. She prepares to use her title and function to help kids, not sell books.” “There is plainly no substance to this declaration from an ex, this is regrettably only attention-seeking and self-serving noise,”
Grisham added.Similarly, when a Vanity Fair story published in late November declared Trump didn’t wish to be very first lady,”come hell or high water,”Trump once again fired back using her surrogate
. Grisham knocked the publication, calling it part of the “liberal media “and claiming the profile was “riddled with unnamed sources and false assertions.”Grisham’s latest action came on the heels of passages in Wolff’s book that claim the President is a persistent philanderer, and that Mr. and Mrs. Trump wouldn’t see each other for days at a time, even when both
were at Trump Tower in New York. Wolff also wrote Trump was an absentee daddy to the couple’s kid, Barron Trump.”Freedom of speech does not mean the flexibility to inform lies. “said Grisham on behalf of her manager.”Possibly one day she will inform her own truthful story, but up until then Mrs. Trump is focused on her role as first lady.”