4 Slurs Democrats Need To Stop Using As Political Weapons

Search for it: When confronted with Republican ideas (or, for that matter, Republicans) Democrats’ go-to stance is always to assert, directly or by ramification, that those ideas and individuals are and must be deemed harmful and disqualified on the basis of four aspects, the 4 Big Slurs. All of them go to Republicans’ basically odiferous and unenlightened character.

It isn’t simply violent rhetoric that stirs the pot; it’s likewise rhetoric that is inherently and non-stop insulting, that dehumanizes, delegitimizes, and ultimately demonizes the opposition.1.


Anyone who disagrees with the liberal progressive approach is stupid, intellectually not up to the task of nuanced discernment or top-level ratiocination. They are either a know nothing or an idiot, a “clown vehicle.”

Smart people gravitate to the places wise people gather– the Democratic Party, the professors lounge, the newsroom, the red carpet– and agree with other clever people, while not-smart individuals go wherever it is stupid people go to sit around being stupid. Probably Louisiana. Or Cracker Barrel, the Indy 500, or Fox News. The progressive position is the smart position, and anybody who does not get to the same spot can only do so by virtue of not being smart enough to obtain there. Get it?

2. Greed

Republican politicians and those who elect them are greedy and self-absorbed, uninterested in such things as justice. Also, they currently have the cash; they just want more. Their selfish needs and wants so consume them that they lack the capability for higher-level things like empathy and compassion, qualities they deem womanish (see “misogyny”) and weak-minded– or with which they are entirely unfamiliar and unconcerned.They are driven by lower-animal impulses, not informed modernism the method great individuals are– excellent individuals like Democrats. Republicans are– why beat around the bush?– wicked.3. Madness Republican politicians are psychologically out of balance, literally crazy. You understand this since the liberal progressive worldview is so undoubtedly right, and everyone concurs with it: the media; academic community; Hollywood, to say nothing of everyone you ever fulfill at a mixed drink celebration. Ipso facto, just a crazy individual could cannot see the immutable fact. Disregard these people or their arguments or their goofy policy propositions; they’re nuts.4. Bigotry This stands in for any “ism”or”ophobia “one cares to manufacture for political advantage. Republican politicians are owned by atavistic, Cro-Magnon individual

animus adequately venomous and deep-rooted as to prevent them from even understanding they are consumed and poisoned by it. Intelligent discourse or reasonable idea, compassion and decency are subsumed to”hate.”They– and their yammerings (see:”hate speech”)– ought to not just be ignored, they need to be condemned as the unsafe credo of unenlightened beings and gotten rid of from the public square by whatever means necessary.These bloated, self-righteous, condescending calumnies belch forth from the top: Listen to a speech, press conference, or TELEVISION interview with Senate Minority Leader Chuck

Schumer, Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez, any one of Hillary Clinton’s project speeches, or, paradise forfend, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. Grab a piece of paper and make a hash mark whenever you hear them make a beeline for among the Four Huge Slurs rather than acknowledge and handle a legitimate counter-position. Your page is going to be filled with inbounds marker almost quicker than you can make them. If you choose your slurs untainted by polished political sanitizing, simply watch any

episode of John Oliver, Samantha Bee, or Costs Maher, who use straw dummies, half-truths, and cherry-pickings to crank out these slurs like an Indian prayer wheel.Of course, they would have their camp followers and acolytes believe there are no reasonable contrary positions. Life is far easier when you do not have to acknowledge that with any hot-topic issue, from climate modification to same-sex marriage, the minimum wage or”reproductive rights,”there exists a robustly crafted opposing argument offered by people equally as smart, equally as caring, similarly as worried about the general welfare and the safety and wellness of the least amongst us, and therefore similarly as deserving of being thought about good, sentient, capable human beings.They share not just the exact same capacity to understand and address the problems in all their complexity, they likewise share the very same goals. However they disagree, due to the fact that they have a various worldview that earnings from some different facilities and, hence, have a various idea as to the best ways to get to the justice, fairness, chance, and good life for all that Democrats declare sole ownership of.This is not to state that none of these things exists: Racism, greed, prejudice-based enmity,”hatred.”All have actually been around from time immemorial, throughout the world, and, provided the nature of mankind probably constantly will. No faction holds the corner on them or is immune from them. But it is to state that summoning them as disqualifiers to toss at your political opponents and those who see the world differently from you does not constitute an argument, is, in fact, the opposite. It is likewise both deceptive and cowardly.No, Republicans Generally Do not Do the Very same Thing Some will be quick to state that Republicans do the same, however they are wrong. Republicans criticize Democrats for the results that circulation like fetid water from the policies they firmly insist upon, while regreting Democrats ‘refusal to even take into consideration those outcomes, being too hectic constantly patting themselves on

the back for their great intentions and the manifest virtue attendant thereto. Put another method: Republicans attack Democrats for what they do; Democrats attack Republicans for who they are, and the latter is considerably more corrosive to the body politic than the former.Accusations of greed, stupidity, hatred, insanity are the standard Crayola box of Democratic political discourse. I’m enlightened; you’re not. I’m modern, updated and notified; you’re antediluvian, yearning for a historical suitable that never ever existed. Requiring actual violence is not the issue,or, at least, not the greatest part of it. When the leadership of one party adopts continuous slurring of their opponents as their most

prevalent and essential tactical tenet, a relentless call to have opponents nullified on the basis of ugly, repellent character characteristics that, if thought, would cause anybody to abhor them, it is an extremely short action to the reason of powerfully removing them from the possibility of harming the commonweal with their dumb, greedy, wicked, self-serving, uncaring selves.Reduce the temperature? Democrats might start by treating their challengers and their arguments with the slightest baseline level of regard, self-respect, and common decency, no matter just how much they might disagree ideologically, and, as a start and perhaps a directing discipline, shun the habit of depending on the Four Big Slurs, no matter how comforting and reflexive they discover them.But that’s not likely. More most likely, they will draw a false equivalence, groaning about”birtherism,” referencing all the racism, misogyny, homophobia, trans-intolerance, Islamophobia, and so on that may not be overt however which they just understand is simmering below the surface area everywhere and which nullifies Republicans ‘claim to anything but contempt, condemnation, and ridicule.And the carousel will continue to go ’round and ’round, with The New York Times constantly discovering some method, somehow, to blame it on Sarah Palin.


Written by 

Related posts